A mechanistic model and associated procedures are proposed for cancer risk
assessment of genotoxic chemicals. As previously shown for ionizing radiati
on, a linear multiplicative model was found to be compatible with published
experimental data for ethylene oxide, acrylamide, and butadiene. The valid
ity of this model was anticipated in view of the multiplicative interaction
of mutation with inherited and acquired growth-promoting conditions. Concu
rrent analysis led to rejection of an additive model (i.e. the model common
ly applied for cancer risk assessment). A reanalysis of data for radiogenic
cancer in mouse, dog and man shows that the relative risk coefficient is a
pproximately the same (0.4 to 0.5 percent per rad) for tumours induced in t
he three species.
Doses in vivo, defined as the time-integrated concentrations of ultimate mu
tagens, expressed in millimol x kg(-1) x h (mMh) are, like radiation doses
given in Gy or rad, proportional to frequencies of potentially mutagenic ev
ents. The radiation dose equivalents of chemical doses are, calculated by m
ultiplying chemical doses tin mMh) with the relative genotoxic potencies ti
n rad x mMh(-1)) determined in vitro. In this way the relative cancer incid
ence increments in rats and mice exposed to ethylene oxide were shown to be
about 0.4 percent per rad-equivalent, in agreement with the data for radio
genic cancer.
Our analyses suggest that values of the relative risk coefficients for geno
toxic chemicals are independent of species and that relative cancer risks d
etermined in animal tests apply also to humans. If reliable animal test dat
a are not available, cancer risks may be estimated by the relative potency.
In both cases exposure dose/target dose relationships, the latter via macr
omolecule adducts, should be determined.