Twenty-five years ago arterial embolization was introduced to facilitate th
e surgical excision of the carcinomatous kidney or to palliate symptoms, su
ch as haemorrhage from non-resectable tumours. The role of this technique i
n the therapeutic armamentarium has been a source of debate in the literatu
re. We reviewed all the available literature. A total of 389 papers were ev
aluated. Fifty-one publications and 3225 case histories met explicit entry
criteria for inclusion. Until now no prospective randomized study of this a
pproach to the management of renal carcinoma has been published. In the maj
ority of studies the patients are grouped together irrespective of indicati
on, i.e. pre-operative or palliative. Few articles are prospective or conta
in clear information regarding tumour stage, indication and adequate follow
-up. Although we are not able to distinguish with certainty the effect of e
mbolization on the course of the disease, it seems that complete pre-operat
ive renal artery embolization facilitates the excision of large vein-invadi
ng tumours. The optimal delay between embolization and operation is probabl
y one day. The embolization material of choice is ethanol. Palliative embol
ization in non-operable tumours with serious haemorrhage seems to have been
successful in most cases. The scientific basis for the implementation of r
enal artery embolization in renal cell carcinoma is weak. We believe that e
ither controlled trials or parallel prospective cohort studies should be un
dertaken to compare treatment of selected locally advanced renal carcinomas
with and without embolization.