This paper reflects upon an application of soft systems methodology in an u
pland catchment situation in Thailand in terms of the philosophical underpi
nnings of approaches to action research. It is argued that a pragmatist phi
losophy may be more appropriate than the popular emancipatory ethic of crit
ical systems.
In the Thai context, patron-client relationships have a fundamental impact
on processes of participatory inquiry, and the identification and implement
ation of collaborative solutions. An adaptation of soft systems methodology
has been used to identify mutually beneficial improvements in management b
etween villager, agency and commercial stakeholders. In the Thai situation,
, it is doubtful to what degree the less powerful village stakeholders wish
to 'emancipate' themselves out of the institutional protocols of patron-cl
ient relationships, as against building further patronage relationships wit
h multiple agency and commercial patrons. Rather than seeking a normative c
ompass through 'emancipation' as a universal ethic, perhaps we should look
to the creative potential within ourselves, and within our cultures. Copyri
ght (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.