Objectives - The study was aimed at improving the accuracy of prognosis for
recovery of function in patients suffering a first stroke. Materials and m
ethods - Two-hundred and forty-eight patients were enrolled. The mean inter
val since the stroke was 23 days. Patients entered a rehabilitation program
lasting 60 days. The predictive value of 12 factors were analysed, namely
motor, cognitive and sphincter subitems of Functional Independence Measure
at admission (FIM-a), age, sex, education, body mass index (BMI), depressio
n, neglect, aphasia, ideomotor and constructive apraxia. FIM score at disch
arge was the dependent variable. Results - A multiple regression revealed t
hat only age, cognitive and sphincter subitems of FIM-a, neglect and ideomo
tor apraxia were significantly associated with outcome. Moreover, these fac
tors accounted for only 72% of the variance in outcome scores. A decision o
f unfavourable prognosis on the basis of a FIM-a value lower than 40 was in
correct in 2.8% of the patients in this study and in 8.2% of those having a
FIM score lower than 40. Conclusions - The use of statistical methods to e
xamine the outcome after stroke is useful for expressing probability on a g
roup basis but is unsuitable for determining the prognosis of individual pa
tients. Such data should not be used for fiscal management. A significant m
inority of patients presenting with a FIM lower than 40 can regain a useful
measure of independence. The errors in prognosis based upon available meth
ods, although small, have unacceptable effects in human terms if they lead
to the clinical decisions which deny patients rehabilitation. All of the pa
tients should therefore be admitted for rehabilitation after their first st
roke. Severe comorbidity requires special attention.