A double-blind, single-dose, crossover comparison of cetirizine, ebastine,epinastine, fexofenadine, terfenadine, and loratadine versus placebo: suppression of histamine-induced wheal and flare response for 24 h in
Ja. Grant et al., A double-blind, single-dose, crossover comparison of cetirizine, ebastine,epinastine, fexofenadine, terfenadine, and loratadine versus placebo: suppression of histamine-induced wheal and flare response for 24 h in, ALLERGY, 54(7), 1999, pp. 700-707
Background: New H-1-antagonists have become available, but there has been n
o comparison of their potency for inhibiting histamine in the skin.
Methods: Cetirizine 10 mg, ebastine 10 mg, epinastine 20 mg, fexofenadine 6
0 mg, terfenadine 60 mg, loratadine 10 mg, or placebo was given to 14 healt
hy male volunteers in a double-blind, crossover randomized manner. Inhibiti
on of the wheal and flare response to epicutaneous histamine phosphate (100
mg/ml) challenge was measured at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, In, 12, and 24 h a
fter doses.
Results: Epinastine inhibited the wheal and flare after 30 min. Cetirizine
commenced acting at 1 h and was superior to other treatments. Ebastine was
no better than placebo until 4 h, but was efficacious thereafter until 24 h
. Terfenadine induced potent inhibition after 1 h and was superior to its m
etabolite fexofenadine. Loratadine was the least potent inhibitor. Inhibiti
on of the flare response paralleled the patterns seen for wheals. The rank
order for area under the curve (0-24 h) was cetirizine, epinastine, terfena
dine, ebastine, fexofenadine, loratadine, and placebo.
Conclusions: The inhibition of histamine effects in the skin may be useful
in predicting the clinical utility of newly introduced antihistamines in tr
eating allergic disorders.