Rm. Macklis et al., Reducing scatter radiation to the contralateral breast with a mobile, conformal shield during breast cancer radiotherapy, AM J CL ONC, 22(4), 1999, pp. 419-425
Citations number
52
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS
During a standard course of breast radiotherapy, the contralateral breast g
enerally receives similar to 2.5 to 6.0 Gy of scattered radiation. Although
most studies have not found an overall increase in metachronous contralate
ral breast cancers in patients undergoing radiotherapy, a cohort of younger
women may be genetically more susceptible to radiation-induced breast canc
ers and may thus be adversely affected by the scattered radiation. We are a
ttempting to develop a simple, convenient, effective mechanism for minimizi
ng the scattered radiation to the contralateral breast during the process o
f clinical breast radiotherapy. We therefore designed a conformal, platform
-based breast shield consisting of 2.5 cm of molded lead in a mobile counte
rweighted polystyrene casing. This shield was intended to serve as a physic
al barrier to prevent both low and high energy scattered photons from the m
edial and lateral tangential fields. We conducted a prospective trial of 20
women, each woman serving as her own control. Each woman received breast r
adiotherapy with and without shield, and an array of thermoluminescent dosi
meters was positioned acres's the contralateral breast to evaluate the in v
ivo dosimetry and the impact of the breast shield on surface absorption of
scattered radiation. We found that the use of the breast shield reduced the
median dose of scattered radiation by similar to 60% (p < 0.0001). This re
presented a median dose reduction of similar to 300 cGy at the nipple. The
shield was easily positioned and added <1 min to daily setup time. We concl
ude that the use of this sort of surface barrier shielding technique was fe
asible, effective, and practical for clinical use. The degree of scatter re
duction accomplished through the use of this breast shield may be biologica
lly significant, especially for those patients with biologic or epidemiolog
ic risk factors that may predispose them to the development of radiogenic b
reast cancers.