Comparison of recovery of anaerobic bacteria using the Anoxomat (R), anaerobic chamber, and GasPak (R) jar systems

Citation
Ph. Summanen et al., Comparison of recovery of anaerobic bacteria using the Anoxomat (R), anaerobic chamber, and GasPak (R) jar systems, ANAEROBE, 5(1), 1999, pp. 5-9
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Biology,Microbiology
Journal title
ANAEROBE
ISSN journal
10759964 → ACNP
Volume
5
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
5 - 9
Database
ISI
SICI code
1075-9964(199902)5:1<5:COROAB>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
The Anoxomat(R) system provides an automated evacuation-replacement techniq ue to create an anaerobic or microaerophilic environment in a jar. We evalu ated the Anoxomat(R) system for the growth of obligate anaerobes and for th e recovery of anaerobic organisms from clinical specimens, and compared its performance to that of an anaerobic chamber and the GasPak(R) System. Of t he 54 stock strains tested, the Anoxomat(R), the chamber, and the GasPak(R) recovered 95%, 95% and 93% at 24 h, respectively. On 29 occasions (51%), t he colonies on the Anoxomat(R) plates were slightly larger than those in th e chamber and on 17 (30%) occasions larger than the colonies on the GasPak( R) jar plates. At 48 h, the Anoxomat(R) the chamber, and the GasPak(R) reco vered 93.5%, 94.4% and 88.9%, respectively; of 108 anaerobes isolated from 31 clinical specimens. Methylene blue indicators became decolorized (averag e of 10 tests) within 2 h inside the Anoxomat(R) jars, 2 h 10 min inside th e anaerobic chamber, and 2 h 30 min inside the GasPak(R) jars. (C) 1999 Aca demic Press.