Sphincter-sparing treatment for distal rectal adenocarcinoma

Citation
Gd. Steele et al., Sphincter-sparing treatment for distal rectal adenocarcinoma, ANN SURG O, 6(5), 1999, pp. 433-441
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
10689265 → ACNP
Volume
6
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
433 - 441
Database
ISI
SICI code
1068-9265(199907/08)6:5<433:STFDRA>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Background: Studies suggest that the anal sphincter can be preserved in som e patients with distal rectal adenocarcinoma (DRA), but this has not been v alidated in any prospective multi-institutional trial. Methods: To test the hypothesis that the anal sphincter can be preserved in some patients with DRA, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B and collaborators reviewed 177 patients who had T1/T2 adenocarcinomas less than or equal to 4 cm in diameter, which encompassed less than or equal to 10% of bowel wall circumference, and were less than or equal to 10 cm from the dentate line. Of the 177 patients, 59 patients who were eligible for the study had T1 ade nocarcinomas and received no further treatment; 51 eligible T2 patients rec eived external beam irradiation (5400 cGY/30 fractions 5 days/week) and 5-f luorouracil (500 mg/m2 IV d1-3, d29-31) after local excision. Results: At 48 months median follow-up, B-year survival and failure-free su rvival rates of the eligible patients are 85% and 78% respectively. Three p atients died of unrelated disease. Two patients were treated for second pri mary colorectal tumors; both remain disease free (NED). Another eight patie nts died of disease, four with distant recurrence only. One T1 patient is a live with distant disease. Two T1 and seven T2 patients experienced isolate d local recurrences; all underwent salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) . After APR, one T1 and four of seven T2 patients were NED at the time of l ast visit (2-7 years). One T1 patient died of local and distant disease. Th ree of seven T2 patients died with distant disease. Conclusions: We conclude that sphincter preservation can be achieved with e xcellent cancer control without initial sacrifice of anal function in most patients. After local recurrence, salvage resection appears effective, but longer follow-up time of local and distant disease-free survival is advised before extrapolation to patients with T3 primaries.