Bp. Chew et al., A comparison of the anticancer activities of dietary beta-carotene, canthaxanthin and astaxanthin in mice in vivo, ANTICANC R, 19(3A), 1999, pp. 1849-1853
The anticancer activities of beta-carotene, astaxanthin and canthaxanthin a
gainst the growth of mammary tumors were studied in female eight-wk-old BAL
B/c mice. The mice power were fed a synthetic diet containing 0, 0.1 or 0.4
% beta-carotene, astaxanthin or canthaxanthin. After 3 weeks, all mice were
inoculated with I x 10(6) WAZ-2T tumor cells into the mammary fat pad All
animals were killed on 45 d after inoculation with the tumor cells. No caro
tenoids were detectable in the plasma or tumor tissues of unsupplemented mi
ce. Concentrations of plasma astaxanthin (20 to 28 mu mol/L) were greater (
P < 0.05) than that of beta-carotene (0.1 to 0.2 mu mol/L) and canthaxanthi
n (3 to 6 mmol/L). However, in tumor tissues, the concentration of canthaxa
nthin (4.9 to 6.0 nmol/g) was higher than that of beta-carotene (0.2 to 0.5
nmol/g) and astaxanthin (1.2 to 2.7 nmol/g). In general, all three caroten
oids decreased mammary tumor volume. Mammary tumor growth inhibition by ast
axanthin was dose-dependent and was higher than that of canthaxanthin and b
eta-carotene. Mice fed 0.4% beta-carotene or canthaxanthin did not show fur
ther increases in tumor growth inhibition compared to those fed 0.1% of eac
h carotenoid. Lipid peroxidation activity in tumors was lower (P < 0.05) in
mice fed 0.4% astaxanthin, but not in those fed beta-carotene and canthaxa
nthin. Therefore, beta-carotene, canthaxanthin and especially astaxanthin i
nhibit the growth of mammary tumors in mice; their anti-tumor activity is a
lso influenced by the supplemental dose.