Hypothesis: Intraoperative ultrasonography is more sensitive than preoperat
ive and other intraoperative techniques for localizing insulinoma.
Design: Retrospective review.
Setting: A tertiary referral center.
Patients: All patients with a biochemical diagnosis of organic hyperinsulin
ism who were referred to University of California, San Francisco, from 1975
to 1998.
Methods: Sensitivities of the localization techniques for insulinoma were e
valuated.
Results: The sensitivities of tumor localization with arteriography, comput
ed tomography, preoperative ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, ma
gnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium, transhepatic venous sampling, pal
pation, and intraoperative ultrasonography were 47%, 24%, 50%, 30%, 40%, 55
%, 76%, and 91%, respectively. Nine of the 11 nonpalpable and nonvisible tu
mors at operation were localized by intraoperative ultrasonography.
Conclusion: The currently available preoperative localization tests are not
reliable enough to be recommended when intraoperative ultrasonography is a
vailable.