A. Escalante et I. Del Rincon, How much disability in rheumatoid arthritis is explained by rheumatoid arthritis?, ARTH RHEUM, 42(8), 1999, pp. 1712-1721
Objective. To measure the proportion of disability explained by disease man
ifestations compared with nondisease factors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Methods. A hypothetical model of the disablement process specific for RA wa
s constructed using the demographic, sociocultural, and clinical characteri
stics of a consecutive cohort of RA patients. Disability was measured with
the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (M-HAQ) and the physical funct
ion scale of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire
. Independent variables, grouped according to their position in the RA disa
blement process model, were sequentially entered in a series of hierarchica
l regression models. The proportion of variance in disability explained by
each group of variables was measured by the group's incremental R-2.
Results. The overall proportion of disability explained by the full model w
as 59%, Factors in the main disease-disability pathway explained 33%, of wh
ich 3% was explained by disease duration, 5% by the Westergren erythrocyte
sedimentation rate, 14% by articular signs and symptoms, and 11% by perform
ance-based functional limitations. External modifiers and contextual variab
les explained 26% of the variance in disability, of which age and sex accou
nted for 2%, formal education 4%, psychological status 17%, and symptoms of
depression 3%.
Conclusion. Both the main disease-disability pathway and factors external t
o this pathway contribute significantly to disability in RA. These findings
provide evidence of the relative influence of psychosocial factors, compar
ed with disease manifestations, on the disability of patients with RA.