Objective. To determine if vitamin D is more effective than no therapy or c
alcium alone in the management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, and
to determine how vitamin D compares with other osteoporosis therapies, e.g.
, bisphosphonates, calcitonin, or fluoride, for this condition.
Methods. We evaluated all formulations of vitamin D, including its active m
etabolites and analogs. A systematic search for published and unpublished s
tudies was conducted using MEDLINE (1966-December 1997), bibliographic refe
rences, abstracts from proceedings of recent national meetings, and contact
with pharmaceutical companies and content experts. We included all randomi
zed controlled trials lasting at least 6 months land reporting extractable
results), of patients receiving oral corticosteroids, that compared vitamin
D with either 1) no therapy or calcium alone, or 2) bisphosphonates, calci
tonin, or fluoride. The primary outcome measure of interest was change in l
umbar spine bone mineral density.
Results, We found a moderate beneficial effect of vitamin D plus calcium ve
rsus no therapy or calcium alone (9 trials) (effect size 0.60; 95% confiden
ce interval [95% CI] 0.34, 0.85; P < 0.0001). In comparisons of vitamin D w
ith other osteoporosis therapies, bisphosphonates were more effective than
vitamin D (6 trials) (effect size 0.57; 95% CI 0.09, 1.05). Calcitonin was
similar in efficacy to vitamin D (9 trials) (effect size 0.03; 95% CI -0.39
, 0.45). Fluoride was more effective than vitamin D, but there were only 2
trials.
Conclusion. Vitamin D plus calcium is superior to no therapy or calcium alo
ne in the management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Vitamin D is l
ess effective than some osteoporosis therapies, Therefore, treatment with v
itamin D plus calcium, as a minimum, should be recommended to patients rece
iving long-term corticosteroids.