M. Bandell et Js. Lolkema, Stereoselectivity of the membrane potential-generating citrate and malate transporters of lactic acid bacteria, BIOCHEM, 38(32), 1999, pp. 10352-10360
The citrate transporter of Leuconostoc mesenteroides (CitP) and the malate
transporter of Lactococcus lactis (MleP) are homologous proteins that catal
yze citrate-lactate and malate-lactate exchange, respectively. Both transpo
rters transport a range of substrates that contain the 2-hydroxycarboxylate
motif, HO-CR2-COO- [Bandell, M., et al. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 18140-1
8146]. In this study, we have analyzed binding and translocation properties
of CitP and MleP for a wide variety of substrates and substrate analogues.
Modification of the OH or the COO- groups of the 2-hydroxycarboxylate moti
f drastically reduced the affinity of the transporters for the substrates,
indicating their relevance in substrate recognition. Both CitP and MleP wer
e strictly stereoselective when the R group contained a second carboxylate
group; the S-enantiomers were efficiently bound and translocated, while the
transporters had no affinity for the R-enantiomers. The affinity of the S-
enantiomers, and of citrate, was at least 1 order of magnitude higher than
for lactate and other substrates with uncharged R groups, indicating a spec
ific interaction between the second carboxylate group and the protein that
is responsible for high-affinity binding. MleP was not stereoselective in b
inding when the R groups are hydrophobic and as large as a benzyl group. Ho
wever, only the S-enantiomers were translocated by MleP. CitP had a strong
preference for binding and translocating the R-enantiomers of substrates wi
th large hydrophobic R groups. These differences between CitP and MleP expl
ain why citrate is a substrate of CitP and not of MleP. The results are dis
cussed in the context of a model for the interaction between sites on the p
rotein and functional groups on the substrates in the binding pockets of th
e two proteins.