Prediction of prostatic cancer progression after radical prostatectomy using artificial neural networks: a feasibility study

Citation
T. Mattfeldt et al., Prediction of prostatic cancer progression after radical prostatectomy using artificial neural networks: a feasibility study, BJU INT, 84(3), 1999, pp. 316-323
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
BJU INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
14644096 → ACNP
Volume
84
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
316 - 323
Database
ISI
SICI code
1464-4096(199908)84:3<316:POPCPA>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Objective To report: a methodological feasibility study in a small series o f patients with node-negative organ-confined prostatic cancer, using artifi cial neural networks to predict tumour progression after radical prostatect omy and thus help to identify high-risk patients who would benefit from adj uvant treatment. Patients and methods A group of 20 patients with pT2N0 prostatic cancer and postoperative tumour progression was compared with a control group of 20 p atients with no progression, matched for age, duration of follow-up and pre operative serum prostate-specific antigen level. Histopathological data wer e obtained from the radical prostatectomy specimens, i.e. the Gleason score , World Health Organisation (WHO) grade and maximum diameter of the tumour transacts. The volume and surface area of the epithelial tumour component a nd of the lumina of the neoplastic glands per unit tissue volume were estim ated by morphometric methods. To predict recurrence, multilayer feedforward networks with backpropagation (MLFF-BP), two implementations of learning v ector quantization (LVQ), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were appli ed. The ability of these models to correctly classify new cases was tested using the 'leave-one-out' technique, Results Progression was predicted correctly in 85% of newly presented cases from the three routine histopathological variables alone. On the basis of the four morphometric variables alone progression was predicted correctly i n 93% of cases. The use of an seven variables as input data only slightly i mproved the quality of prediction. The best results were obtained by the LV Q networks and LDA, followed by MLFF-BP networks. Conclusions In this methodological feasibility study, the progression of pT 2N0 prostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy could be predicted with go od accuracy, sensitivity and specificity from routine variables or morphome tric texture variables using artificial neural networks, These results sugg est that: this approach should be assessed in a prospective study with more cases.