Surveys of patient satisfaction have become commonplace in mental health se
rvices. However, questions about the appropriateness of "satisfaction" as a
concept and its use as an approach to evaluating the quality of service pr
ovision remain as pertinent as ever. Although surveys of patients of mental
health services routinely generate high levels of apparent satisfaction, n
oncompliance with treatment and medication continues to be a major difficul
ty in psychiatric care. To evaluate services properly, there is a need to a
ccess patients' dissatisfaction to determine whether it is a more valid ind
icator of quality of services and a better predictor of noncompliance. Howe
ver, a method that is not time consuming and costly is also required. The a
uthors introduce a new patient evaluation tool, "Your Treatment and Care,"
which requires patients to report on their direct experience of care accord
ing to a set of principles of good practice. The fool forms part of a broad
er package for obtaining patients' views of their own problems, need for ca
ve, quality of care received, and health and social outcomes. The authors a
lso report the results of a survey using this tool. Responses of 75 patient
s of a psychiatric hospital in the United States are presented and compared
with results from a similar survey in the United Kingdom. The comparisons
show striking differences in patients' perceptions of quality of treatment
and care, both within each population and across clinical contexts.