Recent discussions on the 'social clause' have opened up a pandora's box. T
his article probes some of the salient issues raised in that debate by look
ing more specifically at how women's incorporation into the export-oriented
manufacturing sector has been interpreted by neo-classical, institutionali
st and feminist writers. The neo-classical position, represented by the Wor
ld Bank, remains strongly prescriptive but relatively weak in its analysis
of the dynamics of female employment (i.e. its causes and implications) and
the gendered nature of labour markets. There has been a much more construc
tive dialogue between institutionalist and feminist writers. The latter hav
e emphasized the gendered nature of the labour contract, the significance o
f looking beyond the boss/worker dyad (i.e. at the conjugal/familial sphere
) and the importance of listening to women workers' subjective assessments
of their work and its meanings. At the more practical level, while improvin
g the conditions of work remains an important agenda item, for the labour-s
urplus developing countries the question of numbers (of jobs) may arguably
take priority. It is thus important to avoid strategies which may impose a
quantity-quality trade-off. As such it may be useful to explore broad-based
social policies and redistributive measures that can ensure a higher stand
ard of living for the workers without jeopardizing their jobs.