Comparison of diamond and silicon ultraviolet photodetectors

Citation
J. Hiscock et At. Collins, Comparison of diamond and silicon ultraviolet photodetectors, DIAM RELAT, 8(8-9), 1999, pp. 1753-1758
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Apllied Physucs/Condensed Matter/Materiales Science","Material Science & Engineering
Journal title
DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS
ISSN journal
09259635 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
8-9
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1753 - 1758
Database
ISI
SICI code
0925-9635(199908)8:8-9<1753:CODASU>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Measurements have been made on a commercially produced diamond detector, an d on detectors made in-house, all based on polycrystalline chemical vapour deposited (CVD) diamond. The uniformity of response over the sensitive area of each detector has been mapped with 50 or 100 mu m resolution and the si gnal-to-noise ratios have been measured at 220 nm (which is near the peak o f the response for the diamond detectors). We find huge variations in sensi tivity as the position of the spot on the diamond detector is moved. In the most sensitive regions the photocurrent, with a bias of 0.3 V mu m(-1), ca n be much larger than that obtained from a silicon photodiode operated in t he short-circuit mode; however, the signal-to-noise ratio and stability of the signal are superior for the silicon detector. All the diamond detectors respond to visible light to a certain extent, particularly after illuminat ion with ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and the UV response is modified if the detector is simultaneously illuminated with visible light. These phenomena indicate the presence of trapping centres in the material. (C) 1999 Elsevi er Science S.A. All rights reserved.