Dynamics of plant and arthropod diversity during old field succession

Citation
E. Siemann et al., Dynamics of plant and arthropod diversity during old field succession, ECOGRAPHY, 22(4), 1999, pp. 406-414
Citations number
71
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
ECOGRAPHY
ISSN journal
09067590 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
406 - 414
Database
ISI
SICI code
0906-7590(199908)22:4<406:DOPAAD>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
The successional dynamics of arthropod diversity in 18 abandoned agricultur al fields (age 15-54 yr) at Cedar Creek, MN, USA were determined using swee p net sampling (44833 individuals of 618 species). Total arthropod species richness and equitability (J), but not abundance, increased significantly w ith field successional age. Herbivore and parasite species richness, but no t detritivore and predator species richness, also increased significantly w ith field age. All of these arthropod variables were significantly positive ly correlated with plant species richness in the fields. When plant species richness was included as a covariate in regressions, there were no longer any significant effects of field age. These results supported the hypothesi s that increases in arthropod diversity with field age are influenced by in creases in plant diversity. The additional significant positive dependence of herbivore species richness on predator species richness suggests that pr edator-prey interactions may also influence the successional dynamics of ar thropod diversity. Nine of the ten most common arthropod species decreased in abundance with field age, two of them significantly. The abundances of t hese two generalist forb-feeding species, Melanoplus femurrubrum (Orthopter a: Acrididae) and Scaphytopius acutus (Homoptera: Cicadellidae), each depen ded significantly on amount of forbs. The average body size of arthropod sp ecies (total and herbivores) decreased significantly with field age. An eff iciency vs specialization hypothesis predicts such a decrease. Because plan ts in later secondary succession are generally less palatable, a diversity of smaller, potentially more specialized herbivores may have an advantage o ver larger and more efficient herbivores in later succession.