Nash equilibrium presumes that the beliefs of a player are represented by a
probability measure. Motivated by the Ellsberg Paradox and relevant experi
mental findings demonstrating that this representation of beliefs may be un
realistic, this paper generalizes Nash equilibrium in finite extensive form
games to allow for preferences conforming to the multiple priors model dev
eloped by Gilboa and Schmeidler [Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18 (198
9), 141-153]. The implications of this generalization for strategy choices
and welfare are studied. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numb
ers: C72. D81. (C) 1999 Academic Press.