Inter-agency services in England and The Netherlands - A comparative studyof integrated care development and delivery

Citation
B. Hardy et al., Inter-agency services in England and The Netherlands - A comparative studyof integrated care development and delivery, HEALTH POLI, 48(2), 1999, pp. 87-105
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Health Care Sciences & Services
Journal title
HEALTH POLICY
ISSN journal
01688510 → ACNP
Volume
48
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
87 - 105
Database
ISI
SICI code
0168-8510(199908)48:2<87:ISIEAT>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
In England and the Netherlands there is much comparable experience in devel oping and delivering integrated services, provided by different health care agencies to people with multiple care demands. The achievement of integrat ed care provision in such cases appears to be very difficult and laborious in both countries. This article may be considered a first step in exploring the reasons for this and in developing a framework that is not context spe cific, as a contribution to a more generally applicable analysis of obstacl es to integration and the means for overcoming them. After analysing the En glish and Dutch health and social care systems and their development in rec ent decades, we conclude that basically there are clear system similarities which are hindering the integration of services, for instance the predomin ant complexity of the system with a lot of stakeholders having different ro les, tasks, interests and power positions. We have identified common mechan isms that play a dominant role in both systems; not only the social, econom ic and political context, but also the local context, the legal context and funding streams. Other relevant factors are the procedural and structural arrangements at different system levels and the collaborative culture and t radition. The way these mechanisms work in practice, however, is different for England and the Netherlands, due to system differences. In the Netherla nds for instance there is a clear emphasis on bargaining in the context of non-hierarchical structured networks, whilst in England hierarchies and the interplay between hierarchies, markets and networks play a more dominant r ole. In spite of the differences and problems in both countries we have fou nd a similar recognition of interdependence and willingness to pursue integ ration of services for multi-problem patients. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ir eland Ltd. All rights reserved.