High-dose-rate brachytherapy for early breast cancer: An ambulatory technique

Citation
C. Hennequin et al., High-dose-rate brachytherapy for early breast cancer: An ambulatory technique, INT J RAD O, 45(1), 1999, pp. 85-90
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
ISSN journal
03603016 → ACNP
Volume
45
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
85 - 90
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(19990801)45:1<85:HBFEBC>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate tolerance and efficiency of a boost dose delivered by high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) in conservative treatment of breast can cer. To evaluate the feasibility of brachytherapy on an out-patient basis. Methods: One hundred and six patients with T1-T2, NO-NI breast cancers (108 breasts) have been treated with lumpectomy, external irradiation (45 Gy in 5 weeks), and a boost dose on the tumor bed with HDR iridium brachytherapy . Two fractions of 5 Gy were delivered 6 or 24 hours apart, Implantation wa s done during the lumpectomy (group A: 24 cases) or 3 to 4 weeks after the end of external irradiation (group B: 84 cases). For group B, the applicati on was performed on local anesthesia, and did not require hospitalization. Characteristics of the population were as follows: T1: 77 (71.3%); T2: 31 ( 28.7%); median tumor size: 1.5 cm; histology: intraductal carcinomas (DCIS) : 14 (13%); infiltrative ductal carcinomas (IDC): 84 (77.8%); others: 10 (9 .2%). For LDC, surgical margins were found positive in 15 cases, and an ext ensive intraductal component was present in 22 cases. Results: All ambulatory HDR implants were performed as planned. No immediat e toxicity was noticed, except 5 local hematomas. With a median follow-up o f 45 months, 5 local relapses were observed (5-year local relapse rate: 5.1 %). Only histological grade III was significantly correlated with local rel apse. The 5-gear disease-free survival and overall survival were respective ly 93.8% and 93.3%. Cosmetic result was evaluated in 87 cases, and was good or excellent in 48 cases (63.2%), acceptable in 27 cases, and poor in 5 ca ses. Conclusion: HDRB allows the boost dose to be performed on an out-patient ba sis. It seems to offer the same local control as other boost techniques for localized breast cancer with acceptable cosmetic results. (C) 1999 Elsevie r Science Inc.