Computer-assisted decision making in portal verification - Optimization ofthe neural network approach

Citation
K. Leszczynski et al., Computer-assisted decision making in portal verification - Optimization ofthe neural network approach, INT J RAD O, 45(1), 1999, pp. 215-225
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
ISSN journal
03603016 → ACNP
Volume
45
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
215 - 225
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(19990801)45:1<215:CDMIPV>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Purpose: Conventional portal verification requires that a qualified radiati on oncologist make decisions as to the set-up acceptability. This scheme is no longer sustainable with the large numbers of images available on-line a nd stringent time constraints. Therefore the objective of this study was to develop, optimize, and evaluate on clinical data an artificial intelligenc e decision-making tool for portal verification, The tool, based on the arti ficial neural network (ANN) approach, should approximate, as closely as pos sible, portal verification assessments made by a radiation oncologist exper t, Methods and Materials: A total of 328 electronic portal images of tangentia l breast irradiations were included in the study. A radiation oncologist ex pert evaluated these images and rated the treatment set-up acceptability on a scale from 0 to 10, Translational and rotational errors in the placement of the radiation field boundaries formed seven-dimensional feature vectors that represented each of the 328 portal images/treatments. The feature vec tors were used as inputs to a three-layer, feedforward ANN, The neural netw ork was trained on the oncologist's ratings. Results: The rms discrepancy between the ANN and the expert's ratings was 1 .05 rating points. Using the decision threshold equal to 5 for both sets of ratings, the ANN classifier was capable of detecting 100% of the portals c lassified as "unacceptable" by the expert. Only 6.5% of portals acceptable to the oncologist were misclassified as "unacceptable" by the ANN, Conclusion: The results of this study indicate the feasibility of using the ANN portal image classifier as an automated assistant to the radiation onc ologist, Its role would be to recommend an appropriate decision as to the a cceptability or otherwise of a given treatment set-up depicted in a portal image. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.