A procedure is proposed for detecting systematic errors using data of an in
terlaboratory experiment by comparing the coefficients of correlation betwe
en the coefficients of regression equations for different laboratories with
the calculated value. Two samples with significantly different concentrati
ons of analytes are used in this procedure. The results of a cycle of an ex
ternal quality assessment of Russian clinical laboratories were examined in
terms of the analysis of covariance. Concentrations of 14 substances (tota
l protein, glucose, several lipids, nitrogen-containing compounds, and some
elements) were determined in two lyophilized samples of human blood serum
with significantly different concentrations of the analytes. The results we
re grouped in accordance with analytical methods. Linear regression equatio
ns that relate the results obtained in particular laboratories to the certi
fied values were different. In the majority of cases, both the absolute ter
ms and the slope ratios of linear regression equations were reliably differ
ent. The coefficients of correlation between the absolute terms and the slo
pe ratios were compared with theoretically calculated values. In many cases
, the empirical coefficients of correlation were reliably higher than the t
heoretical values, which indicates that the data contain a systematic error
. The cause of this phenomenon is supposedly that a simplified procedure fo
r plotting calibration functions was used in the analytical methods under c
onsideration.