Citation
Ve. Reviglio et al., Laser in situ keratomileus using the LaserSight 200 laser: Results of 950 consecutive cases, J CAT REF S, 25(8), 1999, pp. 1062-1068
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the refractive outcome in 950 consecutive eyes having l
aser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) by 1 surgeon with experience in keratom
ileusis,
Setting: Outpatient excimer laser surgical facility.
Methods: This study comprised 950 consecutive eyes of 475 patients having L
ASIK as a primary procedure with a LaserSight 200 excimer laser (8.51 softw
are). A nasal hinged flap and a Chiron microkeratome were used. Preoperativ
e cycloplegic refraction was done only in patients younger than 25 years an
d in all hyperopic cases, Subjective preoperative and postoperative manifes
t refractions were done after autorefractometry in all cases. In cases of h
yperopia, the software was modified by adding 30% to the refractive error.
Enhancement results are not included.
Results: Of the 950 eyes, 893 (94.00%) were myopic and 57 (6.00%), hyperopi
c, in the low myopia group (1.00 to 3.99 D) of 223 eyes (24.97%), mean sphe
rical equivalents (SEs) were -2.90 D +/- 0.56 (SD) preoperatively, -0.46 +/
- 0.6 D 3 months postoperatively, and -0.41 +/- 0.5 D 6 months postoperativ
ely. In the moderate myopia group (4.00 to 5.99 D) of 205 eyes (22.96%), re
spective mean SES were -4.90 +/- 0.7 D, -0.90 D +/- 0.9 D, and -0.67 +/- 0.
7 D. In the high myopia group (6.00 to 9.99) of 266 eyes (25.30%), the resp
ective-means were -7.70 +/- 1.3 D, -0.76 +/- 0.99 D, and -0.60 +/- 0.8 D. I
n the extreme myopia group (10.21 to 30.00) of 199 eyes (22.28%), the respe
ctive means were -13.30 +/- 2.9 D, -1.30 +/- 1.4 D, and -1.13 +/- 1.3 D, Fo
r the entire myopic group, the mean astigmatism was +1.55 +/- 1.38 P, +1.09
+/- 0.92 D, and +0.87 +/- 0.79 D, respectively, The low hyperopia group (1
.00 to 2.99 D) of 39 eyes (68.42%) had a mean preoperative SE of +1.80 +/-
0.59 D and mean postoperative SEs of +1.00 +/- 0.76 D at 3 months and +1.16
+/- 0.52 D at 6 months. The respective means in the moderate hyperopia gro
up (3.00 to 6.00) of 18 eyes (31.57%) were +4.62 +/- 1.19 D, +3.71 +/- 1.12
D, and +4.00 +/- 1.07 D.
Conclusions: Laser in situ keratomileus for myopia using the LaserSight 200
excimer laser was stable with time and safe for the correction of differen
t degrees of myopia. In the hyperopic group, marked regression occurred in
a large percentage of patients. Thus, we will not perform LASIK for hyperop
ia until the software improves.