Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of topical anesthesia as an alternative t
o peribulbar or retrobulbar anesthesia in phacoemulsification and intraocul
ar lens (IOL) implantation combined with pars plana vitrectomy.
Setting: Clinica de Ojos de Maracaibo, Maracaibo, and the Retina and Vitreo
us Service, Clinica Oftalmologica Centro Caracas, Caracas, Venezuela.
Methods: in this prospective study, phacoemulsification, IOL implantation,
and posterior vitrectomy using topical anesthesia (lidocaine 4% drops) were
prospectively performed in 45 eyes (45 patients) with varied vitreoretinal
pathology including macular holes, epiretinal membranes, subfoveal neovasc
ular membranes, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and vitreous hemorrhage
. Preoperative and intraoperative sedation of varying degrees was necessary
. Subjective pain and discomfort were graded from 1 (no pain or discomfort)
to 4 (severe pain and discomfort).
Results: All patients had grade 1 pain and discomfort during most of the pr
ocedure. All patients had grade 2 (mild) pain and discomfort during pars pl
ana sclerotomies, external bipolar cautery, and conjunctival closure. The m
ean amount of lidocaine 4% drops required during each procedure was 0.5 mL.
No patient required additional retrobulbar, peribulbar, or sub-Tenon's ane
sthesia.
Conclusions: This technique avoids the risks of globe perforation, retrobul
bar hemorrhage, and prolonged postoperative akinesia of the eye at a lower
cost. With appropriate case selection, topical anesthesia was a safe and ef
fective alternative to peribulbar or retrobulbar anesthesia in phacoemulsif
ication and IOL implantation combined with posterior 3-port pars plana vitr
ectomy. (C) 1999 ASCRS and ESCRS.