Bs. Glisson et al., Cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with extensive small-cell lung carcinoma, J CL ONCOL, 17(8), 1999, pp. 2309-2315
Purpose: The combination of cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel was studie
d in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer in a phase I component
followed by a phase II trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD),
characterize toxicity, and estimate response and median survival rates.
Patients and Methods: Forty-one patients were treated between October 1993
and April 1997. Doses for the initial cohort were cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on d
ay 1, etoposide 80 mg/m(2)/d on days 1 to 3, and paclitaxel 130 mg/m(2) on
day 1 over 3 hours. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for up to six cycles
. The MTD was reached in the first six patients. In these six patients and
in the next 35 patients, who were entered onto the phase II trial, response
and survival were estimated.
Results: Al the initial dose level, one of six patients developed febrile n
eutropenia, and five of six achieved targeted neutropenia (nadir absolute g
ranulocyte count, 100 to 1,000/1 mu L) without any other dose-limiting toxi
city, defining this level as the MTD. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 8
8 (47%) of 188 total courses administered at or less than the MTD. Neutrope
nia wets associated with fever in only 17 (9%) of 188 courses, but two pati
ents experienced neutropenic sepsis that was fatal. Nonhematologic toxicity
greater than grade 2 was observed in 10 (5%) of 188 total courses, with fa
tigue, peripheral neuropathy, and nausea/vomiting most common. The overall
objective response rate was 90% of 38 assessable patients: six complete res
ponses (16%) and 28 partial responses (74%). Median progression-free and ov
erall survival durations were 31 and 47 weeks, respectively.
Conclusion: The combination of cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel produce
d response and survival rates similar to those of other combinations and wa
s well tolerated.