A comparison of lysis centrifugation, pour plate, and conventional blood culture methods in the diagnosis of septicaemic melioidosis

Citation
Ajh. Simpson et al., A comparison of lysis centrifugation, pour plate, and conventional blood culture methods in the diagnosis of septicaemic melioidosis, J CLIN PATH, 52(8), 1999, pp. 616-619
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
ISSN journal
00219746 → ACNP
Volume
52
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
616 - 619
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9746(199908)52:8<616:ACOLCP>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Aims-To determine whether quantitative blood culture methods could improve the diagnosis of septicaemic melioidosis. Methods-A comparison of conventional broth based blood cultures, a pour pla te method, and a commercial lysis centrifugation (Isolator 10(TM)) blood cu lture system was conducted in 71 Thai patients with severe melioidosis. The time to identification of B pseudomallei was recorded for each method. Results-42 patients (59%) were septicaemic. Compared with conventional bloo d culture, the Isolator and pour plate methods had sensitivities of 81% and 61%, respectively. The median times to a positive culture were:Isolator 39 .3 hours, pour plates 45.5 hours, broth culture 61.8 hours (p < 0.001 Isola tor v broth). There was a significant inverse correlation between Isolator tube or pour plate quantitative counts and time to detection (r = -0.44 and -0.57, respectively). Mortality was higher in patients who were septicaemi c. Conclusions-Routine use of one of these quantitative methods, in addition t o conventional broth culture, may lead to earlier diagnosis of septicaemic melioidosis.