K. Watanabe et al., Effect of insulin resistance on left ventricular hypertrophy and dysfunction in essential hypertension, J HYPERTENS, 17(8), 1999, pp. 1153-1160
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Background In hypertensive patients, the relationships between glucose tole
rance and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and left ventricular diastolic
function (LVDF) have been described in several reports.
Objective In this study, we examined the relationships between insulin resi
stance and LVH and LVDF in hypertensive patients from the therapeutic persp
ective
Methods and results The study participants were essential hypertensive pati
ents with impaired glucose tolerance (IGI-HT, n = 26), hypertensive patient
s with normal glucose tolerance (NGT-HT, n = 39), and normotensive control
individuals (n =18). Insulin resistance was evaluated by the insulin suppre
ssion test by use of the steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG) level. Left ven
tricular mass index (LVMI) and LVDF, which was determined by the E:A ratio,
were estimated by echocardiography. Temocapril, an angiotensin-converting
enzyme inhibitor, was administered in an open, nonrandomized manner with a
mean dose of 2.8 +/- 0.2 mg/day, and the mean administration period was 18
weeks. The systolic and diastolic blood pressure, the LVMI, and the SSPG le
vel were significantly higher in the hypertensive patients than in the cont
rol individuals. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were signi
ficantly decreased by treatment with Temocapril. Before treatment, stepwise
regression analysis showed that SSPG is an independent predictor for LVMI
and LVDF. After treatment, the changes in LVMI (D-LVMI; %) (-15.1 +/- 1.5),
the changes in LVDF (D-E:A; %) (-38.2 +/- 4.1), and the changes in insulin
resistance (D-SSPG; %) (-13.7 +/- 1.7) were significantly higher in the IG
T-HT group than in the NGT-HT group (-11.4 +/- 1.1, -18.1 +/- 1.7, -9.4 +/-
1.4, respectively), and the D-SSPG was an independent predictor for D-LVMI
and D-E:A.
Conclusions The results of this study indicate that insulin resistance is a
n important factor affecting LVH and LVDF. I Hypertens 1999, 17:1153-1160 (
C) Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.