Influence of radiographic contrast media (iomeprol 350 versus iopentol 350) on cutaneous microcirculation: Single-center prospective randomized double-blind phase IV study in parallel-group design
F. Jung et al., Influence of radiographic contrast media (iomeprol 350 versus iopentol 350) on cutaneous microcirculation: Single-center prospective randomized double-blind phase IV study in parallel-group design, J INVAS CAR, 11(1), 1999, pp. 2-8
Objective. This single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind phase
IV study in parallel-group design was carried out to investigate whether ei
ther of two different x-ray contrast media (iomeprol 350 or iopentol 350) i
njected into the axillary artery has any influence on cutaneous microcircul
ation.
Methods and Results. The investigation was carried out on two groups of pat
ients (n = 10 in each group) who had to undergo a diagnostic heart catheter
angiography. The confirmatory response variable for the study was the mean
capillary erythrocyte velocity (mm/sec). Blood flow through the ipsilatera
l nail-fold capillaries was recorded continuously for 3 minutes before and
6 minutes after the injection of the randomly assigned x-ray contrast mediu
m, and was evaluated off-line. A contrast medium-induced, theologically det
ermined disturbance of the microcirculation was found, which was due to two
different effects. First, the high intrinsic viscosity (iopentol = 12.3 mP
a.sec) led to an immediate reduction in capillary blood flow. This did not
occur in the case of iomeprol (intrinsic viscosity = 7.5 mPa.sec). Second,
the contrast medium molecules cause a morphological change in the erythrocy
te membrane; echinocytes are formed and are further desiccated depending on
osmolality of the contrast medium.
Conclusion. The time course of the con conversion of erythrocytes into echi
nocytes leads to a maximum reduction in capillary erythrocyte velocity of 3
0 seconds after the bolus of contrast medium. For the more viscous contrast
medium of higher osmolarity (iopentol), this led to a significant overall
reduction of up to 48.6% in capillary blood flow (p < 0.0001) that lasted f
or up to 150 seconds, while iomeprol did not significantly affect capillary
blood flow (p = 0.2759).