Accounts for materialism are examined based on qualitative research in Roma
nia, Turkey, the USA, and Western Europe. Various spontaneously offered acc
ounts reconcile the discrepancy between the belief that materialism is bad
and materialistic consumption behavior and aspirations. These accounts incl
ude justifications - passionate connoisseurship, instrumentalism, and altru
ism - and excuses - the compelling external forces, the ways of the modern
world, and deservingness. The differences in accounts can be understood cul
turally and historically. In negotiating the 'bad' material world with thei
r own consumption worlds, informants draw from various ethics prevalent in
their cultures to moralize their personal materialistic consumption. Our fi
ndings suggest ways in which materialism, moralized by local accounts, is a
ble to grow globally in spite of its condemnation.