Methods to avoid adverse effect of circulating antigen on biodistribution of I-125-labeled antiTac dsFv: Preinjection of intact antibody versus clearance of antigen with avidin-biotin system
H. Kobayashi et al., Methods to avoid adverse effect of circulating antigen on biodistribution of I-125-labeled antiTac dsFv: Preinjection of intact antibody versus clearance of antigen with avidin-biotin system, J NUCL MED, 40(8), 1999, pp. 1381-1391
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
The presence of circulating antigen may adversely affect the biodistributio
n of a radiolabeled antibody. The alpha subunit of the interleukin-2 recept
or (IL-2R alpha) is a cell-surface receptor that is overexpressed in variou
s hematologic malignancies and in benign disorders. This receptor is cleave
d from the cell surface and can be found in high concentrations in serum. R
adiolabeled antiTac antibodies are being evaluated to target this receptor.
Previous studies have shown that circulating soluble IL-2Ra (sIL-2R alpha)
adversely affected the biodistribution of radiolabeled antiTac disulfide-s
tabilized (ds)Fv. In this study, we compared blocking and clearing sIL-2R a
lpha to see which better minimized its interference with the biodistributio
n of radiolabeled antiTac dsFv Methods: Two models of sIL-2R alpha were use
d: one consisted of mice given intravenous sIL-2R alpha and the other consi
sted of mice bearing SP2/Tac tumor xenografts (IL-2Ra: positive), which she
d sIL-2R alpha. We biotinylated humanized antiTac monoclonal antibody (bt-H
uTac) and radiolabeled it with I-125. We then compared its biodistribution
with that of humanized antiTac monoclonal antibody IgG (HuTac). We examined
the biodistribution of an injected dose of I-125-labeled antiTac dsFv afte
r a preinjection of HuTac to block the sIL-2R alpha epitope and after a pre
injection of bt-HuTac, followed by an avidin chase. Result: The I-125-label
ed bt-HuTac cleared from the serum at a rate similar to that of HuTac. The
avidin chase effectively cleared >92% of circulating I-125-labeled bt-HuTac
within 20 min and was also effective in clearing sIL-2R alpha. In comparis
on, HuTac prolonged the retention of I-125-labeled sIL-2R alpha in the circ
ulation, and the avidin chase decreased I-125-labeled sIL-2R alpha to <18%
of control. Although the two-step antigen-clearing system effectively clear
ed the antigen from the circulation and improved the biodistribution of I-1
25-labeled dsFv, the HuTac preinjection method had a similar but longer las
ting beneficial effect on I-125-labeled dsFv biodistribution. Conclusion: P
reinjection of either HuTac or bt-HuTac with avidin chase improved the biod
istribution of subsequently administered I-125-labeled antiTac dsFv by prev
enting the dsFv from binding to the sIL-2R alpha, but the HuTac blocking me
thod is simpler and longer lasting.