Statement of problem. Accuracy of techniques for recording the orientation
of the maxillary arch to the articulation of the temporomandibular joints h
as been reported. The variability contributed by the dentist and the equipm
ent within a technique may also contribute to technical error.
Purpose. This study investigated the variability of a group of dentists who
used an arbitrary ear-face-bow instrument to mount a maxillary cast.
Material and methods. The same maxillary cast on a single experimental subj
ect was mounted on an articulator with a common arbitrary ear-face-bow inst
rument. This cast was equipped with 4 reference points for the measurement
of changes of spatial orientation of the cast, which were determined throug
h coordinate measurements with a machinist's microscope. A repeated measure
s analysis of variance was used to determine statistically significant chan
ges in spatial orientation with a Wilks' Lambda test to compare mean values
.
Results. A confidence interval of 95% demonstrated that any dentist might e
xpect a range of +/-1.2 mm error in using this instrument/articulator combi
nation. The 3 dentists did not demonstrate any significant differences in t
he spatial orientation of their mountings in the vertical or horizontal dir
ections. However, there were significant differences in their mountings in
linear distance changes of the patient's posterior right side.
Conclusion. A range of inherent error attributable to the operator using th
is instrument was recorded.