Statement of problem. Procedures involved in the tooth preparation, impress
ion, and casting of partial veneer three-quarter crowns are considered to b
e complex.
Purpose. This study assessed whether a simplified partial veneer crown desi
gn, when cemented with a 4-META adhesive resin, had a comparable resistance
to displacement forces compared with a conventionally prepared partial ven
eer crown cemented with a traditional luting agent.
Material and methods. Conventional partial veneer crowns were prepared on 2
0 natural premolars, and 20 other premolars received modified partial venee
r crown tooth preparations without proximal grooves. Artificial crowns were
made for these teeth with Students alloy. Half the crowns in each of the 2
groups were luted with 4-META resin; the other half were luted with a zinc
phosphate cement. Loads required to displace the partial veneer crowns wer
e recorded after 24 hours and thermocycling, then the mode of separation wa
s recorded for each crown. Average force required to displace partial venee
r crowns for the 4 groups were subjected to 2-way analysis of variance and
Scheffe test.
Results. The 2 groups luted with 4-META resin and the group with proximal g
rooves luted with zinc phosphate were not significantly different. However,
they were all greater than the group without proximal grooves luted with z
inc phosphate cement.
Conclusion. Forces required to displace partial veneer crowns prepared in a
traditional manner and those teeth prepared without proximal grooves were
similar if the artificial crowns were luted with adhesive resin cement.