Statement of problem. Wear resistance of restorative materials is a major c
oncern in clinical practice for restorations involving occlusion. The relat
ively poor wear resistance of dental composites in stress-bearing posterior
situations has restricted even wider clinical application of this type of
restorative material.
Purpose. This in vitro study compared the relative wear resistance of a sel
ection of current dental composites and amalgams under cyclic loading to ex
plore the wear mechanisms operating on these materials and to assess their
relative potential clinical wear resistance under variable masticatory load
s.
Material and methods. A 2-body in vitro wear test was undertaken on a selec
tion of 2 Ultrafine Compact-Filled composites, 1 microfilled composite, and
3 dental amalgams. An alternating sine curve load (0.5 to 15 N)! was appli
ed to the wear surface through a rotating countersample with a purpose-buil
t system to simulate the variable loading pattern that occurs during mastic
ation.
Results. Under conditions simulating the repetitive cyclic loading pattern
that may occur intraorally in high stress occlusal contact situations, the
Ultrafine Compact-Filled composites exhibited a delamination wear pattern a
nd had a significantly lower wear resistance than the amalgams. By comparis
on, the microfilled composite (Silux Plus) displayed an improved wear resis
tance that was superior to some amalgams. Dispersalloy had the best wear re
sistance among the materials selected.
Conclusion. The wear of Ultrafine Compact-Filled composite and microfilled
composite differed and reflect different operative wear mechanisms. For ama
lgams, the size, shape, and composition of the particles had an effect on t
he wear resistance of the materials.