Increased risk of death in patients with do-not-resuscitate orders

Citation
Lb. Shepardson et al., Increased risk of death in patients with do-not-resuscitate orders, MED CARE, 37(8), 1999, pp. 727-737
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Health Care Sciences & Services
Journal title
MEDICAL CARE
ISSN journal
00257079 → ACNP
Volume
37
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
727 - 737
Database
ISI
SICI code
0025-7079(199908)37:8<727:IRODIP>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Whereas studies have shown higher mortality rates in patients w ith do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, most have not accounted for confoundin g factors related to the use of DNR orders and/or factors related to the ri sk of death. OBJECTIVE. TO determine the relationship between the use of DNR orders and in-hospital mortality, adjusting for severity of illness and other covariat es. DESIGN. Retrospective cohort study. PATIENTs. There were 13,337 consecutive stroke admissions to 30 hospitals i n 1991 to 1994. MEASURES. TO decrease selection bias, propensity scores reflecting the like lihood of a DNR order were developed. Scores were based on nine demographic and clinical variables independently related to use of DNR orders. The odd s of death in patients with DNR orders were then determined using logistic regression, adjustment for propensity scores, severity of illness, and othe r factors. RESULTS. DNR orders were used in 22% (n 2,898) of patients. In analyses exa mining DNR orders written at any time during hospitalization, unadjusted in -hospital mortality rates were higher in patients with DNR orders than in p atients without orders (40% vs. 2%, P < 0.001); the adjusted odds of death was 33.9 (95% CI, 27.4-42.0). The adjusted odds of death remained higher in analyses that only considered orders written during the first 2 days (OR 3 .7; 95% CI, 3.2-4.4) or the first day (OR 2.4; 95% CI, 2.0-2.9). In stratif ied analyses, adjusted odds of death tended to be higher in patients with l ower propensity scores. CONCLUSION. The risk of death was substantially higher in patients with DNR orders after adjusting for propensity scores and other covariates. Whereas the increased risk may reflect patient preferences for less intensive care or unmeasured prognostic factors, the current findings highlight the need for more direct evaluations of the quality and appropriateness of care of p atients with DNR orders.