Large epidemiological studies often require short food frequency questionna
ires (FFQ) to minimize the respondent burden or to control for confounding
from dietary factors. In this analysis, we compared the extensively used Na
tional Cancer institute-Block 60- and 100-item FFQs with one another and wi
th usual intake as estimated from 12 clays of validation data. The analysis
focused on nutrients from different aspects of the diet, including energy,
fat, saturated fat, p-carotene, dietary fiber, and vitamin C. By use of an
errors-in-variables analysis, the correlations of usual intake with the tw
o types of FFQs for these nutrients were not different. Attenuation coeffic
ients, a measure of misclassification error, far both FFQs were of similar
magnitude and indicated that substantial attenuation of logistic regression
coefficients would result from either FFQ. Our results confirm previous an
alyses describing the validity and utility of the 60-item FFQ (Epidemiology
1, 58-64, 1990) and indicate that it is essentially equivalent to the 100-
item FFQ for epidemiological analyses of major nutrients.