This study examines the portfolio allocation decisions of 80 business stude
nts in a computer-based investing simulation, Our goal was to better unders
tand why investors spend so much time and money on actively managed mutual
funds despite the fact that the vast majority of these funds are outperform
ed by passively managed index funds. Participants' judgments and decisions
provided evidence for a number of biases. First, most participants consiste
ntly overestimated both the future performance and the past performance of
their investments. Second, participants overestimated the intertemporal con
sistency of portfolio performance. Third, participants were more likely to
shift their portfolio allocation following poorer performance than followin
g better performance, and this tendency had a negative impact on portfolio
returns. We speculate that these biases in investor behavior may contribute
to suboptimal investment decisions in real financial markets. (C) 1999 Aca
demic Press.