The discussion on the results of open spinal surgery, in particular, on com
plications as a result of open surgery, e. g., the so-called post-discotomy
syndrome, has led to the development of less invasive methods, especially
for treatment of lumbar disc prolapses. Percutaneous nucleotomy procedures
are based on a variety of intradiscal diagnostic and therapy methods, such
as discography, retroperitoneal spinal disc fenestration or chemonucleolysi
s. Since the 1970 s, various methods such as mechanical percutaneous nucleo
tomy, automated percutaneous nucleotomy, intradiscal laser procedures and,
in part, endoscopic intradiscal procedures have been developed and also use
d clinically. The clinical results vary from 30% good/very good results to
almost 100% good/very good results, depending on the author and study. It i
s obvious that not many prospective randomized studies using either conserv
atively or surgically treated control groups have been conducted. The resul
ts of these studies on intradiscal therapy methods are often analyzed more
critically and with lower success rates than the partially retrospective st
udies of a single method, which often have large case numbers, but do not a
lways meet the demanding criteria for scientific study design. To attain go
od results, percutaneous nucleotomy procedures can only be used to treat se
lect cases of lumbar disc disorders according to strict indication criteria
. At the present time it can be concluded that, in comparison to endoscopic
und microsurgical methods, percutaneous nucleotomy procedures must be rest
ricted to a small number of cases.