Socioeconomic aspects of peritoneal dialysis in North America: Role of nonmedical factors in the choice of dialysis

Citation
V. Venkataraman et Kd. Nolph, Socioeconomic aspects of peritoneal dialysis in North America: Role of nonmedical factors in the choice of dialysis, PERIT DIA I, 19, 1999, pp. S419-S422
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
08968608 → ACNP
Volume
19
Year of publication
1999
Supplement
2
Pages
S419 - S422
Database
ISI
SICI code
0896-8608(1999)19:<S419:SAOPDI>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Patients initiating dialysis therapy must make a choice between hemodialysi s (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Controversy persists over the relative merits of each modality in the treatment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) . Issues relating to survival, morbidity, economics, and patient characteri stics will all determine the final choice of therapy. Non medical factors a re the most important determinant of dialysis modality selection. In the United States, HD has been the more commonly used modality, while PD is underrepresented. This disparity arises from multiple factors including reactions (sometimes incorrect) to the healthcare financing structure, phy sician biases, and changing demographic patterns in the ESRD population. We discuss these issues and present collected evidence showing that increased use of PD may have substantial overall benefit.