The dynamics, time evolution of the mass distribution, and gravitation
al wave signature of coalescing neutron stars described by polytropes
are compared with three simulations published previously: (a) ''Run 3'
' of Zhuge et al. (1994), (b) ''Model III'' of Shibata et al. (1992),
and (c) ''Model A64'' of Ruffert et al. (1996). We aim at studying the
differences due to the use of different numerical methods, different
implementations of the gravitational wave backreaction, and different
equations of state. We integrate the three-dimensional Newtonian equat
ions of hydrodynamics by the Riemann-solver based ''Piecewise Paraboli
c Method'' on an equidistant Cartesian grid. Comparison (a) confronts
the results of our grid-based PPM scheme with those from an SPH code.
We find that due to the lower numerical viscosity of the PPM code, the
post-merging oscillations and pulsations can be followed for a longer
time and lead to larger secondary and tertiary maxima of the gravitat
ional wave luminosity and to a stronger peak of the gravitational wave
spectrum at a frequency of about f approximate to 1.8 KHz when compar
ed to the results of Zhuge et al. (1994). In case (b) two grid based c
odes with the same backreaction formalism but differing hy drodynamic
integrators and slightly different initial conditions are compared. In
stead of rotationally deformed initial neutron stars we use sphericall
y shaped stars. Satisfactory agreement of the amplitude of the gravita
tional wave luminosity is established, although due to the different i
nitial conditions a small time delay develops in the onset of the dyna
mical instability setting in when the two stars come very close. In (c
) we find that using a polytropic equation of state instead of the hig
h-density equation of state of Lattimer & Swesty (1991) employed by Ru
ffert et al. (1996) does not change the overall dynamical evolution of
the merger and yields agreement of the gravitational wave signature t
o within 20% accuracy. Whereas the polytropic law describes the dynami
cal behaviour of the bulk of the matter at and above nuclear density s
ufficiently well, we, however, find clear differences of the structure
and evolution of the outer layers of the neutron stars where the stif
fness of the equation of state is largely overestimated. This has impo
rtant implications for questions like mass loss and disk formation dur
ing the merging of binary neutron stars.