Objective: To document the influence of hospital prescribers on prescribing
in general practice.
Design and Participants: Five percent of members of the Irish College of Ge
neral Practitioners (n = 92) prospectively recorded 40 consecutive prescrip
tions.
Interventions: The name, dose and amount of medicine prescribed as well as
the indication for therapy, details of their practice, distribution of priv
ate/GMS patients, and the number of years since qualification were recorded
. The cost of individual prescriptions was calculated based on the ingredie
nt cost and the number of days of treatment. This was subsequently correlat
ed with the origin of the prescription. Each prescription was classified as
either new or repeat.
Main outcome measures and results: Of 3286 prescriptions, 69% were for the
state-supported General Medical Services (GMS) patients and 31% for private
patients. Repeat prescriptions constituted 51%; 49% were new prescriptions
. While hospital doctors initiated only 8% of private prescriptions, they i
nitiated 38% of GMS prescriptions, particularly repeat prescriptions and th
ose for cardiovascular, hormonal and centrally-acting agents. Prescriptions
for anti-infectives, oral contraceptives, dermatological preparations and
musculoskeletal drugs were mostly initiated in general practice.
The median cost for hospital-initiated GMS prescriptions (pound 5.93) was g
reater than the cost of general practitioner (GP)-initiated prescriptions (
pound 3.49; p < 0.01). Prescriptions from GPs who were qualified for less t
han 10 years and those with a mixed urban and rural practice were less cost
ly (p < 0.05) than those issued by doctors qualified for over 10 years or w
orking predominantly in an urban or rural area. These findings may also ref
lect differences in patient population, morbidity and demography.
Conclusions: Our study indicates that hospital-initiated prescriptions are
responsible for a significant proportion, both in volume and cost of GP pre
scribing.