Se. Swedo et al., A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LIGHT THERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF PEDIATRIC SEASONAL AFFECTIVE-DISORDER, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(6), 1997, pp. 816-821
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of light therapy for the treatment
of pediatric seasonal affective disorder (SAD). Method: 28 children (
aged 7 to 17 years) at two geographically distinct sites were enrolled
in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of bright-ligh
t treatment. Subjects initially entered a week-long baseline period du
ring which they wore dark glasses for an hour a day. They were then ra
ndomly assigned to receive either active treatment (1 hour of bright-l
ight therapy plus 2 hours of dawn simulation) or placebo (1 hour of cl
ear goggles plus 5 minutes of low-intensity dawn simulation) for 1 wee
k. The treatment phase was followed by a second dark-glasses phase las
ting 1 to 2 weeks. After this phase, the children received the alterna
te treatment. Response was measured using the parent and child version
s of the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating
Scale, Seasonal Affective Disorders version (SIGH-SAD). Results: Data
were analyzed as change from baseline. SIGH-SAD-P total depression sc
ores were significantly decreased from baseline during light therapy c
ompared with placebo (one-way analysis of variance, p = .009), and no
differences were found between the placebo and control phases. Subscor
es of atypical and typical depression were also significantly decrease
d during the active treatment (p = .004 and .028, respectively). A sim
ilar trend was noted with the SIGH-SAD-C, but this did not reach signi
ficance. At the end of the study, 78% of the parents questioned and 80
% of the children questioned rated light therapy as the phase during w
hich the child ''felt best.'' Conclusion: Light therapy appears to be
an effective treatment for pediatric SAD.