This paper is an attempt to understand the origin of the analyst conviction
about both the patient analyzability and the psychoanalytic endeavor: Clin
ical material will be used to illustrate the way that the intensity of the
analyst's conviction is or isn't noticed or interpreted, by both patient an
d analyst. The primary hypothesis to be proposed is that the analyst's awar
eness of the transmission of conviction during conversion (or evaluation) c
an trigger recognition and use of a critical period for identification with
an underlying mutual fantasy of intergenerational, analyst-patient convict
ion about analysis.