Major current notions of persuasion depict it as attainable via 2 qualitati
vely distinct routes: (a) a central ora systematic route in which opinions
and attitudes are based on carefully processed arguments in the persuasive
message and (b) a peripheral or heuristic route in which they are based on
briefly considered heuristics or cues, exogenous to the message. This artic
le offers a single-route reconceptualization that treats these dual routes
to persuasion as involving functionally equivalent types of evidence from w
hich persuasive conclusions may be drawn. Previous findings in the dual-pro
cess literature are reconsidered in light of this "unimodel," and novel dat
a are presented consistent with its assumptions. Beyond Its parsimony and i
ntegrative potential, the unimodel offers conceptual, empirical, and practi
cal advantages in the persuasion domain.