P. Rudolph et al., PROGNOSTIC RELEVANCE OF A NOVEL PROLIFERATION MARKER, KI-S11, FOR SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMA - A MULTIVARIATE STUDY, The American journal of pathology, 150(6), 1997, pp. 1997-2007
In 132 soft-tissue sarcomas and 52 benign soft-tissue tumors, cellular
proliferation was examined by immunohistochemistry using monoclonal a
ntibodies Ki-S11 (Ki-67 antigen) and Ki-S1 (topoisomerase II alpha) an
d by flow cytometric analysis of the S-phase fraction (SPE). Malignant
tumors were graded histologically according to the Federation Nationa
le des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) system. Patient age,
sex, tumor location, histological type, and DNA ploidy were considere
d as additional prognostic variables. Consistent immunoreactivity was
seen in approximately 95% of the cases, and determination of SPF was p
ossible in approximately 60%. Ki-S11 and Ki-S1 immunolabeling indices
correlated in a linear manner. All proliferation parameters yielded si
gnificant differences between benign and malignant tumors. Ki-S11 and
Ki-S1 immunoreactive scores also co-varied significantly with SPF, mit
otic count, and histopathological grade. In univariate analysis, immun
ohistochemical proliferation indices, histopathological grade, mitotic
count, and SPF were predictive of overall survival and the developmen
t of metastases. In multivariate analysis, immunolabeling scores of pr
oliferation markers, grade, and SPF emerged as independent predictors
of global survival and systemic progression. We conclude that the immu
nohistochemical assessment of proliferation, being more readily perfor
mable and more easily assessable than the equally relevant S phase fra
ction, may add appreciable information to the current prognostic model
s for soft-tissue sarcoma.