The utility of noninvasive serologic markers in the management of early allograft rejection in liver transplantation recipients

Citation
Rc. Dickson et al., The utility of noninvasive serologic markers in the management of early allograft rejection in liver transplantation recipients, TRANSPLANT, 68(2), 1999, pp. 247-253
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
00411337 → ACNP
Volume
68
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
247 - 253
Database
ISI
SICI code
0041-1337(19990727)68:2<247:TUONSM>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Background. Early allograft rejection after orthotopic liver transplantatio n (OLT) currently requires a biopsy for diagnosis, Alpha-glutathione S-tran sferase (alpha-GST) and Pi-glutathione S-transferase (Pi-GST) are potential noninvasive markers of hepatocyte and biliary epithelial cell injury. Our aim was to determine the utility of noninvasive serologic markers in the ma nagement of early hepatic allograft rejection. Methods. Forty-four of 52 consecutive adult patients undergoing primary OLT at the University of Florida were included in the study. All had protocol liver biopsies between days 6 and 8 after OLT, Serum alpha-GST and plasma P i-GST were determined using a sandwich enzyme immunoassay (Biotrin Internat ional, Dublin, Ireland). All biopsy specimens were retrospectively reviewed and scored for rejection and cholestasis. Results. The biopsy specimens were scored for rejection as moderate to seve re in 14 patients (group 1) or none to mild in 30 patients (group 2), Group 1 had statistically higher mean levels than group 2 for alpha-GST on days 6, 7, and 9; alanine aminotransferase on days 6 and 9; aspartate aminotrans ferase (AST) on days 6 and 7; alkaline phosphate (AP) on days 3 through 7, 9, and 10; and gamma-glutamyl transferase on day 3. No differences between groups were seen with Pi-GST or total bilirubin. Between days 6 and 8, the following values were found more frequently in group 1 than group 2: alpha- GST level >15 ng/ml (11/14 vs. 14/30; P<0.01); AST >100 U/L (8/14 vs, 2/30; P=0.002); and AP >120 U/L (14/14 vs. 17/30). Combining AP with either alph a-GST or AST led to improved detection of rejection over any single marker alone. In the first week after the initiation of rejection treatment, alpha -GST was the only marker that accurately predicted response. Conclusion. Serum alpha-GST may be useful in the management of early hepati c allograft rejection. A combination of noninvasive markers may be benefici al to diagnose early hepatic allograft rejection.