The genetic code might be a historical accident that was fixed in the last
common ancestor of modern organisms. 'Adaptive', 'historical' and 'chemical
' arguments, however, challenge such a 'frozen accident' model, These argum
ents propose that the current code is somehow optimal, reflects the expansi
on of a more primitive code to include more amino acids, or is a consequenc
e of direct chemical interactions between RNA and amino acids, respectively
. Such models are not mutually exclusive, however, They can be reconciled b
y an evolutionary model whereby stereochemical interactions shaped the init
ial code, which subsequently expanded through biosynthetic modification of
encoded amino acids and, finally, was optimized through codon reassignment,
Alternatively, all three forces might have acted in concert to assign the
20 'natural' amino acids to their present positions in the genetic code.