Quantitative residual cortical activity measurement: Appropriate test for diagnosis of renal artery stenosis?

Citation
A. Gezici et al., Quantitative residual cortical activity measurement: Appropriate test for diagnosis of renal artery stenosis?, UROL INTERN, 62(1), 1999, pp. 1-7
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS
ISSN journal
00421138 → ACNP
Volume
62
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1 - 7
Database
ISI
SICI code
0042-1138(1999)62:1<1:QRCAMA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic validity of quantitative measurement of residual cortical activity (RCA) in renal artery stenosis (RAS). Method s: In 45 patients with a high clinical likelihood of renovascular hypertens ion (RVH) and unimpaired renal function, dynamic imaging was performed afte r an intravenous bolus injection of 148 MBq Tc-99m MAG3 for both baseline r enoscintigraphy and captopril renography following oral application of 50 m g captopril. RCA was measured according to the Sfa-kianakis method: RCA = c ortical counts at 20 min/counts at peak x 100%. An increase in RCA of great er than or equal to 5% from baseline was considered indicative of RAS. Afte r renography, all patients underwent selective transfemoral angiography wit h the digital subtraction technique. A luminal reduction of greater than or equal to 50% was considered as proof of RAS. Results: The number of kidney s that had a change of 15% in RCA values was 12 (27.2%) in normal kidneys, 7 (58.3%) in the patients with bilateral RAS, 14(82.3%) in the patients wit h unilateral RAS, and 21 (72.4%) in overall kidneys with RAS. The positive test ratio in pathologic groups was significantly higher than normal (p < 0 .05). The sensitivity and specificity of the RCA test were 72.4 and 72.7%, respectively; the positive and negative predictive values were 63.6 and 80% , respectively. Conclusion: Quantitative measurements of RCA can be used as a diagnostic parameter of renal artery stenosis and may contribute of the diagnostic accuracy of visual interpretation and other renographic diagnost ic criteria.