V. Murgraff et al., Regret is what you get: The effects of manipulating anticipated affect andtime perspective on risky single-occasion drinking, ALC ALCOHOL, 34(4), 1999, pp. 590-600
This study tested anticipated affect as a potential strategy for reducing r
isky single-occasion drinking (RSOD). The hypothesis was that asking respon
dents to focus on their anticipated affect following RSOD would lead to hig
her ratings of negative affect than those obtained when asking respondents
to focus on their feelings towards RSOD. In turn, these negative affect rat
ings were hypothesized as lending to safer behavioural estimates and reduct
ions in RSOD. The study is based on a self-report questionnaire administere
d at two time points. At Time 1, measures of past drinking and demographic
information were collected, along with affect ratings of drinking within sa
fer single-occasion limits and affect ratings of RSOD (within-subjects cond
ition). Time perspective was manipulated whereby the experimental group was
asked to focus on affective reactions after RSOD and the control group to
focus on affective reactions rewards RSOD (between-subjects condition). Two
weeks later, drinking behaviour was measured. The findings showed that the
time perspective manipulation resulted in significantly higher negative af
fect ratings in the feeling after condition than in the feeling rewards con
dition. Further, females reported lower negative affect than males. No othe
r main or interaction effects were found. The time perspective manipulation
, however, failed to produce safer behavioural estimates and RSOD reduction
at follow-up. No significant differences were found between ratings of neg
ative affect when drinking within safe limits as compared with ratings of a
ffect when drinking above such limits. Despite greater negative affect 'aft
er' rather than 'toward' the target behaviour, anticipated affect following
RSOD did net yield safer behavioural estimates and subsequent drinking red
uction at follow-up. These findings are interpreted in the context of risk
perception associated with RSOD. The implications of this study for design
of interventions aimed at reducing RSOD are discussed. In particular, ways
of intensifying negative affect for RSOD are considered.