Background: To expose patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD
) to the least amount of medication and to reduce health expenditures, it i
s recommended that their treatment is started with a small dose of an antis
ecretory or prokinetic medication, If patients fail to respond, the dose is
increased in several consecutive steps or the initial regimen is changed t
o a more potent medication until the patients become asymptomatic. Although
such treatment strategy is widely recommended, its impact on health expend
itures has not been evaluated.
Methods: The economic analysis compares the medication costs of competing m
edical treatment strategies, using two different sets of cost data. Medicat
ion costs are estimated from the average wholesale prices (AWP) and from th
e lowest discount prices charged to governmental health institutions. A dec
ision tree is used to model the step-wise treatment of GERD, In a Monte Car
lo simulation, all transition probabilities built into the model are varied
over a wide range. A threshold analysis evaluates the relationship between
the cost of an individual medication and its therapeutic success rate,
Results: In a governmental health care system, a stepwise strategy saves on
average $916 per patient every 5 years (range: $443-$1628) in comparison w
ith a strategy utilizing only the most potent medication, In a cost environ
ment relying on AWP, the average savings amount to $256 (-$206 to +$1561).
The smaller the cost difference between two consecutive treatment steps, th
e longer one needs to follow the patients to reap the benefit of the small
cost difference. However, even a Small cost difference can turn into tangib
le cost savings, if a large enough fraction of GERD patients responds to th
e initial step of a less potent but also less expensive medication.
Conclusions: The economic analysis suggests that a stepwise utilization of
increasingly more potent and more expensive medications to treat GERD would
result in appreciable cost savings.